Residential Fellowships

The Humanities Research Center’s annual residential fellowships are awarded to 4-6 faculty members and at least one Ph.D. student per year. The goal is to foster intellectual exchange and to enhance the quality of research at VCU by exposing faculty to different perspectives and methodologies. Fellows meet as a group once a week during the Fellows' Seminar to discuss their works-in-progress. Fellows are given the opportunity to give public presentations about their projects during the academic year following their residency at the Center. Publications resulting from this fellowship program must acknowledge the Center’s support.

Faculty Residential Fellowships

Graduate Student Residential Fellowships

Residential Fellowship applications for the 2025-26 academic year are open.

2024-25 Residential Fellows

Caddie Alford

Caddie Alford, PhD

Associate Professor of Rhetoric and Writing, Department of English

“Rhetorical Restoration: A Paradigm of Repair for the Aftermath of Digitality”

A rise in fascism, reactionary responses, and fraudulent content signals that rhetoric is in disrepair from the fallout of ubiquitous digitality. Rhetoric’s previous goals of democratic consensus and identification now seem difficult or almost impossible to achieve or conceptualize. What was once considered rhetorical practice no longer makes sense because discourse now forms in corporate platforms, and as for socializing, proprietary algorithms wall us off from one another. Rhetoric needs an audience, but now that audience includes omniscient surveillance. The rhetor must find the available means of persuasion, but now those means are preprogrammed.

I will respond to these shifts by composing an article-length flagship journal article that constructs a fresh paradigm for specifically digital rhetoric, toward creating and formalizing contemporary, user-generated tactics for such actions as argumentation, reading, and relating. Building on the influential rhetorical situation debate from 1968-2005, I will reframe what rhetoric entails while providing different tools. Examining such phenomena as the rise in conspiracies, the appropriation of academic terms like “othering,” and the increase in people opting for ‘private’ communication channels, I will suggest that a productive paradigm for rhetoric could be repair: reframing rhetoric as a practice of restoration turns rhetoric toward a collective pursuit of defying Big Tech’s capitalist logics.

Julian Kevon Kamilah Glover

Julian Kevon Kamilah Glover, PhD, MPA

Assistant Professor, Department of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies

“Black Boundlessness: Performance, Ethics and Aesthetic Under Duress”

This project culminates as a book that chronicles processes of personal and interpersonal transformation and emphasizes the world-making practices that Black people use to create a meaningful life in spite of the influence of numerous systems of oppression. Specifically, I argue that the contradictory, complex and capacious nature of Black life offers Black artists and everyday people an opportunity to establish freedom practices that conjures an ethics which supports individual rehabilitation, the cultivation of intentional communities and generative possibilities beyond societally imposed constraints and boundaries. The book uses a mixed methodology (qualitative interviews, textual and lyrical analysis) to investigate freedom practices including multiplicity, transmutation (shapeshifting) and critical nonmonogamy—all of which offer strategies, tactics and tools that Black people use to imbue life with significance in ways that do not privilege assimilation. The book engages the creative work of artists including Moses Sumney, Yves Tumor, Audre Lorde, Taiye Selasi and Akwaeke Emezi in addition to interpersonal relationships among quotidian Black people across the U.S., Vancouver, Canada and London, England to reveal how diasporic freedom practices manifest around the world.

Ying-Chao Kao

Ying-Chao Kao, PhD

Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology

“Transtopia in Trans*-formative Education: Trans-locally Comparing the Institutions and Practices of Gender Equity, Pronouns, and Indigenous Justice in Virginian and Taiwanese Democratizations”

As over 30 countries legalized same-sex marriage, American and global conservatives have shifted their cherry-picked “wedge issue” from marriage equality to policies against LGBTQ youth and students. What constitutes and (re)produces the ongoing transphobic attacks? How can we learn from the hope, joy, and resistance of global trans* and non-conforming actors to reimagine the possibilities of transtopian futures? This research employs Sinophone historian Howard Chiang’s “transtopia” theory to decolonize the socio-history of Euro-American-centric cisnormative orders, deconstruct essentialist categories of gender and sexualities (including transgenderism), and decenter both Americanness and Chineseness that dominate the worldview of trans-related histories and hierarchies. This project expands from my current Taiwan-focused book chapter, and further selects Virginia State and Taiwan for trans-local comparison and transnational mutual-learning to explore a variety of opportunities of transtopia as the “antidote” to transphobia across borders (Chiang 2021:5). 1 This trans-Pacific comparison focuses on three dimensions: (1) trans*-inclusive education institutional designs and practices of LGBTQ-inclusive curricula and instruction; (2) the (gendered, de-gendered, re-gendered) pronoun practices beyond English-language-centrism; and (3) indigenous nations’ marginalized gender/sexual traditions and cultural appropriation in both Virginia State and Taiwan. Forty interviews with local experts, educators, and indigenous Peoples will be conducted for trans- local comparison (20 in Virginia and 20 in Taiwan). This research will produce an assemblage of cross-cultural opportunities to resist transphobia, cisnormativity, transnormativity, and gender binarism multi-dimensionally and poly-chronically. This project with transnational comparative edges also helps to decenter the dominant perspectives of gender, sexuality, and power that both American White supremacism and Han-Chinese ethnonationalism imposed upon trans* and gender non-conforming bodies, knowledge, spirituality, and collectives through re-centering the bottom-up practices and imaginations of various futures of democratizations and gender equity/equality.

Sarah Raskin

Sarah E. Raskin, PhD, MPH

Associate Professor, L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs

“Structural Racism in U.S. Professional Dentistry, 1815-present”

My proposed project considers how structural racism—or the written or unwritten policies, institutional practices, and entrenched beliefs, attitudes, and norms that “scaffold” the unjust treatment of racially minoritized patients and providers—is not merely contextual or coincidental to the history of professional dentistry and the social significance of teeth but, rather, is constitutive of them. Drawing together eclectic resources from the histories of U.S. dentistry and popular culture, and scholarly literature, I will explore the persistence of racialized concepts, policies, and practices in U.S. dental professional history; consider how popular and commercial notions of home hygiene; oral health services; and dental esthetics have reflected racialized ideas about beauty, character, and morality; and assess the future of anti-racism in U.S. professional dentistry.

Jessica Trisko Darden

Jessica Trisko Darden, PhD

Associate Professor, Department of Political Science

“The Accused: How Women Escaped Justice for Nazi-Era War Crimes”

The Accused: How Women Escaped Justice for Nazi-Era War Crimes challenges current understandings of Nazi war crimes and post-war justice by focusing on the hundreds of women prosecuted in German courts between 1945 and 1982 for crimes ranging from euthanasia to violent crimes in concentration camps. I demonstrate that women were acquitted at a higher rate, received lighter sentences, and were more successful on appeal than the men prosecuted alongside them. Nazi women benefited in the courtroom from societal biases that see women as less capable of and less responsible for harm. The extent and implications of this gender imbalance have not been recognized in existing research on Nazi war crimes trials. The resulting book and public website shed new light on women’s involvement in the Holocaust, how Germany’s post-war justice systems reflected and reinforced gendered understandings of Nazi criminality, and the implications of these historical failures for contemporary war crimes prosecutions of women.

Jatia Wrighten

Jatia Wrighten, PhD

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science

“Oppression Made Us Leaders: Black Women, Heavy Lifting, and Leadership”

The purpose of this book project is to apply a novel intersectional framework, the heavy lifter theory, to leadership attainability in state legislatures. It is a logical and unique way to examine the gender ascription of Black women. This work helps to shed light on the political behavior of Black women, the institutional obstacles they face, and the lasting power of ancestral talent development.This research presents a historical context by which to understand and examine the gendered nature of the ascription process of Black women. Specifically, their experience as a marginalized group burdened them with the duty of the heavy lifter. Although being the heavy lifter is a burden, this focus on Black women’s ability to thrive under constant discrimination in the form of racism and sexism should give scholars pause. In looking at Black women legislators’ ability to gain leadership, the heavy lifter identity can potentially be a vehicle through which Black women legislators can find a sense of purpose and both psychological and social strength to forge their own unexpected path.

Rian Johnson

Rian Johnson,

PhD Candidate in the Media, Art and Text Program

“The Fantasyscape Quotidian: On Life in Other Worlds”

“The Fantasyscape Quotidian” is a dissertation exploring the ways in which single-player, high
fantasy, role-playing video games represent and simulate everyday life and quotidian experiences in worlds that are not our own. Following theories of the everyday, non-mimetic fiction, and video games and agency, this work aims to lay a groundwork for approaching the mundane and the non-epic within fantasy works and provides a close reading of four games with the belief that there is a radical, liberatory, or affective potential to exploring and experiencing other ways of living.

Prior Fellows